Evidence

Content concerning the impacts of technology on evidence law.

Article: Preserve or Perish; Destroy or Drown - eDiscovery Morphs into Electronic Information Management

North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology, Volume 8, Issue 1, Page 1 (December 2006)

Abstract

Electronic discovery-including the contents of e-mail messages and/or the deletion of e-mails-has driven the outcome of many high-profile cases. We live in a progressively more digital world. Thus, when disputes ripen into litigation, clients, attorneys, and judges have had to focus increasingly on preserving, gathering, culling, reviewing, and producing electronic information. The complexity of information technology (IT) and the costs of mastering IT have burgeoned. Only some eDiscovery issues are resolvable by resort to traditional discovery principles.

Full Article Text

Cite as: Robert D. Brownstone, Preserve or Perish; Destroy or Drown - eDiscovery Morphs into Electronic Information Management , 8 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 1 (2006), available at http://cite.ncjolt.org/8NCJLTech1.

Subject Areas:

Article: We Are Not a Daubert State--But What Are We? Scientific Evidence in North Carolina after Howerton

North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology, Volume 6, Issue 2, Page 289 (June 2005)

Abstract

In June of 2004, the North Carolina Supreme Court decided Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd., which interpreted the standard for admitting expert testimony under Rule 702 of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence. The issue before the court was whether a North Carolina trial court's gatekeeping responsibility under Rule 702 is the same as that imposed on the federal courts by the Supreme Court's 1993 decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which requires an independent preliminary assessment of whether the proffered expert testimony is both reliable and relevant.

Full Article Text

Cite as: John M. Conley & Scott W. Gaylord, We Are Not a Daubert State--But What Are We? Scientific Evidence in North Carolina after Howerton, 6 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 289 (2005), available at http://cite.ncjolt.org/6NCJLTech289.

Subject Areas:

Recent Development: Lorraine v. Markel: An Authoritative Opinion Sets the Bar for Admissibility of Electronic Evidence (Except for Computer Animations and Simulations)

NC JOLT Online Edition, Volume 9, Page 16 (December 2007)

Abstract

Lorraine v. Markel may have a profound impact on the world of electronic evidence admissibility for its guidance to lawyers, but in the area of computer animations and simulations, it carries a mixed message. The opinion takes a progressive approach to the unfair prejudice standard, granting broad discretion to courts to admit computer animation and simulation into evidence. However, the opinion takes a conservative approach to the treatment of computer simulations as scientific evidence.

Full Article Text

Cite as: Lindsay J. Kemp, Recent Development, Lorraine v. Markel: An Authoritative Opinion Sets the Bar for Admissibility of Electronic Evidence (Except for Computer Animations and Simulations), 9 NC JOLT Online Ed. 16 (2007), http://cite.ncjolt.org/9NCJOLTOnlineEd16.

Subject Areas:

User login